It looks like it is Obama and Huckabee. You can look up the rest of the results elsewhere but one thing that confuses me is that pundits are saying that finishing second is seriously damaging to Romney. Why is that? We have known for some time that Huckabee had struck a chord with Evangelicals in Iowa and was leading. He finished second and is well positioned moving into New Hampshire. Also, Guiliani and McCain did not even play in Iowa. Does this mean they are done?
Media hype for Huckabee notwithstanding, it is a long road and we are a long way from knowing who the winner will be. Just ask Howard Dean.
Comments